Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 24% better in Minecraft than Radeon R7 240 - 621 vs 499 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 83% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €94.99 vs €549.37
- Up to 78% better value when playing Minecraft than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €0.19 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 30 vs 120 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
621
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
21%
Price, €
€549.37
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €549.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
499
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$279 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |