Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 70 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 24% better in Ready or Not than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 113 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 4 GB
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
91
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |