Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 7700 XT is 1585 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 66% cheaper than Radeon RX 7700 XT - €144.99 vs €424.21
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT - 75 vs 245 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Performs up to 756% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1650 - 77 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1650 - €5.51 vs €16.11 per FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 12 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16598 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 25th, 2023
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€424.21
34%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €424.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 25th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
16%
Desktop • Aug 25th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 25th, 2023 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi III |
$149 | MSRP | $449 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2544 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |