Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 2236 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 1400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 260X - 15 vs 1 FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 100 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
31.884057971014496%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
44.63768115942029%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $159 | MSRP | $139 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
| 1725 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |
