Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2253 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Radeon R7 265 - 49 vs 37 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
