Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2381 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon R7 240 - 87 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 30 vs 50 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
59
67%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |