Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 is 230 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 167 vs 165 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 4% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1050 - €143.0 vs €148.73
- Up to 2% better value when playing F1 23 than GeForce GTX 1050 - €0.87 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 65 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 4 vs 2 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
97%
Price, €
€148.73
96%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
165
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
67%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$109 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1354 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1455 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |