Key Differences
In short — Radeon HD 7950 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon HD 7950 is 1063 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Radeon HD 7950 - 150 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GTS 250 - 51 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 3 vs 1 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon HD 7950
Desktop • Jan 31st, 2012
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
42.1875%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
48.21428571428572%
Radeon HD 7950
Desktop • Jan 31st, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
25.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
89.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 31st, 2012 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Southern Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $449 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
