Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GeForce GT 630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 3885 days newer than GeForce GT 630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 96% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GT 630 - 110 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 16 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 630
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 630
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
3.24 GPixel/s
1.7070600632244466%
Texel Fillrate
12.96 GTexel/s
2.5150397826508835%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1335 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
