Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 511 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 49 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 28% better in Monster Hunter: World than GeForce GT 620 - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 2 vs 1 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
15.909090909090907%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
18.18181818181818%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |