Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 2750 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 58 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 34% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce GT 220 - 127 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
4.851425106124925%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
3.6382011116725623%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Vega |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |
