Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 1375 days older than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 50 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
76.92307692307692%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
76.92307692307693%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
