Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 2480 days older than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 50 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
24.973985431841832%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
18.735362997658083%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
