Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 4151 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 58 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 48% better in FIFA 23 than GeForce GT 220 - 200 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 32 vs 1 GB
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro W6800
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2.155365963179165%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
2.5862068965517246%
Radeon Pro W6800
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $2249 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 32 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2075 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2320 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
