Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 4151 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 58 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 70% better in Dead Space than GeForce GT 220 - 68 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro W6600
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2.9073288915808604%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
4.982698961937716%
Radeon Pro W6600
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2580 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
