The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Sep 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
47
92%
Min 1% FPS
20
87%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Sep 2nd, 2020
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
22 GPixel/s
65%
Texture Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
1.408 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
1.408 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |