The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 45 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
40
31%
Min 1% FPS
15
20%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Alchemist |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
