Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2326 days newer than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Advantages of Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 15 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 6100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 62 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 16 vs 0 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€542
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7524 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
15%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |