Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 316 days older than UHD Graphics P630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than UHD Graphics P630 - 90 vs 85 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
69%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
HD Graphics-WM | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |