Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms UHD Graphics 600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1525 days older than UHD Graphics 600.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 5 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 300% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than UHD Graphics 600 - 28 vs 7 FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
1.3 GPixel/s
4.0625%
Texel Fillrate
7.8 GTexel/s
6.09375%
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Dec 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
