Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1397 days older than UHD Graphics 600.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 5 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 38% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than UHD Graphics 600 - 33 vs 24 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
1.3 GPixel/s
4.391891891891892%
Texel Fillrate
7.8 GTexel/s
13.175675675675674%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
