Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 2598 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Arc A310 - 15 vs 30 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 19% better in Dead Space than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 50 vs 42 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
50
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€173.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €173.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |