Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 360 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 360 is 745 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 360 - 45 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 360
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 48 vs 40 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R7 360
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
91%
Radeon R7 360
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
16.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
50.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
