Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms HD Graphics 630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 929 days older than HD Graphics 630.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 630
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 6 than HD Graphics 630 - 68 vs 62 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 630
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 630
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
3 GPixel/s
10.135135135135135%
Texel Fillrate
24 GTexel/s
40.54054054054054%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 630 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
