Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms HD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 369 days older than HD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 5 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 70% better in No Man's Sky than HD Graphics 610 - 97 vs 57 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texel Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
4%
Intel HD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
