Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms HD Graphics 505 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 371 days older than HD Graphics 505.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 6 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 63% better in Battlefield V than HD Graphics 505 - 122 vs 75 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.95 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
11.7 GTexel/s
4%
Intel HD Graphics 505 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | HBM |
System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |