Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4748 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 54% better in World of Warcraft than GeForce 210 - 195 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 75% cheaper than Arc A750 - €49.98 vs €203.99
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 31 vs 225 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €203.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74473 minutes ago
Buy for €49.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
0.7738095238095238%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
0.7738095238095238%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |