Key Differences
In short — Arc A350M outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A350M is 3025 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of Intel Arc A350M
- Performs up to 0% better in League of Legends than Radeon R7 260 - 367 vs 366 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 25 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Arc A350M
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
30.303030303030305%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
45.45454545454546%
Intel Arc A350M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
