The HD Graphics 510 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 15 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
39
83%
Min 1% FPS
15
75%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, €
€109.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€219.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€96.99
In Stock
HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
182.4 GFLOPS
15%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
HD Graphics 510 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Polaris |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
| 11.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
| 182.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
