The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 20 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
28%
Min 1% FPS
20
19%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€1152.93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.78/FPS
100%
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
10%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Navi II |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
