The GeForce GTX 870M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 870M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 100 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 870M vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 870M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
48
39%
Min 1% FPS
20
28%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€332.26
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.72/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€332.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€254.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€284.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
GeForce GTX 870M vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 870M vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 870M vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 870M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
120 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
27.08 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
108.3 GTexel/s
20%
FP32
2.599 TFLOPS
15%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 870M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 120 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 27.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 108.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.599 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
