The GeForce GTX 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 760M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 55 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 760M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 760M
May 30th, 2013
Average FPS
43
40%
Min 1% FPS
17
28%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 760M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 760M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 760M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 760M
May 30th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
64.13 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
11.5 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
46.02 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
1.104 TFLOPS
12%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 11.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
| 46.02 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.104 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |
