The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon 780M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 120 Watts
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon 780M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€500.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€299.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.87
In Stock
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
71%
Min 1% FPS
28
64%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon 780M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon 780M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon 780M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
98%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
66%
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $279.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi III IGP |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | System-Shared |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | System-Shared |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | System-Shared |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 86.4 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 129.6 GTexel/s |
| 5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.294 TFLOPS |
