The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only €457.16 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 91% cheaper – €45.99 vs €503.15
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 31 vs 120 Watts
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€503.15
9%
Value, €/FPS
€6.06/FPS
19%
Buy on Amazon
€503.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€349.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€228.74
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€79.50
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $279.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
