Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 997 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 50 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 34% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 67 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
FPS
67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€29.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1998
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,998 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
20%
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
None | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |