The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €162.34 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 120 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% cheaper – €164.99 vs €327.33
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Average FPS
69
95%
Min 1% FPS
34
92%
Price, €
€327.33
50%
Value, €/FPS
€4.74/FPS
48%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€164.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€164.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€156.94
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
82.03 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
136.7 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
4.375 TFLOPS
61%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
60%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 19th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| $299.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 192.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
82.03 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 136.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 4.375 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
