The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
74%
Min 1% FPS
25
68%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€164.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€164.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€151.28
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
84%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
28%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
