Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1477 days newer than GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 53 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 50 vs 75 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
53
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €246.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 778 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
18.22 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
45.56 GTexel/s
41%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1139 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |