The GeForce GT 540M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 540M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 540M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
32%
Min 1% FPS
14
20%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
121
100%
Min 1% FPS
70
100%
Price, €
€816.71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.74/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 540M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 540M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 540M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
2.688 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
10.75 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
258 GFLOPS
2%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 540M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.688 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 10.75 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| 258 GFLOPS | FP32 | 16.2 TFLOPS |
