The GeForce GT 520 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 29 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Average FPS
39
93%
Min 1% FPS
14
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
100%
Min 1% FPS
16
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
16%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $59.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
29 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.62 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
| 6.48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
| 155.5 GFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |
