Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3444 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 69 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GT 240 - 127 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 4 vs 1 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€412.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €412.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 240 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$80 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |