The GeForce GT 1030 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon 780M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 1030
The Radeon 780M is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 15 vs 30 Watts
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon 780M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Average FPS
46
78%
Min 1% FPS
19
68%
Price, €
€107.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€107.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€84.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€113.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€130.38
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€123.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€136.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€92.90
In Stock
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
100%
Min 1% FPS
28
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon 780M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon 780M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon 780M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
1.127 TFLOPS
14%
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 1030 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $79.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Navi III IGP |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | System-Shared |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | System-Shared |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | System-Shared |
48.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.49 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 86.4 GPixel/s |
| 35.23 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 129.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.127 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.294 TFLOPS |
