Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 1030 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GT 1030 is 2774 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce GT 1030
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce 210 - 49 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 30 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 2 vs 0 GB
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GT 1030 - €1.07 vs €1.76 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
FPS
49
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
61%
Price, €
€86.12
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €86.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 371 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 1030 | vs | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$79 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
48.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1228 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1468 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |