The GeForce 940M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5500 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 940M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce 940M vs Radeon RX 5500 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
42
58%
Min 1% FPS
16
43%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€139.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
100%
GeForce 940M vs Radeon RX 5500 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 940M vs Radeon RX 5500 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 940M vs Radeon RX 5500 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
17.57 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
35.14 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
1.124 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
162.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.196 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 940M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 12th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $169.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.57 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.04 GPixel/s |
| 35.14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 162.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.124 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.196 TFLOPS |
