The GeForce 920MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 16 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Average FPS
41
39%
Min 1% FPS
16
28%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€458
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.4/FPS
100%
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.944 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
23.83 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
508.4 GFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
16 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.944 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 23.83 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 508.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
