The GeForce 920MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 16 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Average FPS
41
49%
Min 1% FPS
16
36%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€1789.95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.3/FPS
100%
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.944 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
23.83 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
508.4 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
16 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.944 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 23.83 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 508.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
