The GeForce 920M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 33 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
40
82%
Min 1% FPS
15
71%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, €
€145.63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.97/FPS
100%
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
37%
Texture Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
74%
FP32
732.7 GFLOPS
44%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.632 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| 30.53 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| 732.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
