Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4482 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro W6400 - €1.07 vs €3.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 31 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 56% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce 210 - 67 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.72/FPS
29%
Price, €
€249.45
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 210 | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |