The Arc A380 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's €268.84 cheaper!
Advantages of the Arc A380
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 65% cheaper – €143.82 vs €412.66
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
The Arc A380 is better in every way
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€143.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€182.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€230.47
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
93%
Min 1% FPS
31
89%
Price, €
€412.66
34%
Value, €/FPS
€6.44/FPS
32%
Buy on Amazon
€412.66
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€422.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€433.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€199.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€367.19
In Stock
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
69%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
81%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
71%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
71%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A380 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |