The Arc A350M is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 25 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€238.86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.73/FPS
100%
Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
94%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |
